MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANS-ZYGOMATIC AND PTERYGOID IMPLANT SURGERY TECHNIQUE IN THE REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE MAXILLARY ATROPHY
https://doi.org/10.33667/2782-4101-2022-1-19-23
Аннотация
Angular and trans-zygomatic implants are an alternative to most augmentation procedures on the upper jaw. Priority application of trans-zygomatic, pterygoid and traditional implants on the upper jaw in different techniques and combinations. Extensive possibilities for rehabilitation of patients with severe and extreme atrophy and post-traumatic changes of the upper jaw. Trans-zygomatic implants provide immediate functional loading with prosthetic constructions according to the protocol of intraoperative direct prosthetics. Treatment time, cost and the need for augmentation procedures are reduced. Specialists strive to reduce the risks and invasiveness of techniques by optimising surgical access techniques.
Об авторах
M. Gladyshev
Department of oral rehabilitation of the Private Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Moscow Witte University
Россия
Россия
V. Put
Department of Oncology radiology and plastic surgery of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Россия
Россия
A. Dolgalev
Department of General Practice and Pediatric Dentistry, Stavropol State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Россия
Россия
A. Gladysheva
Medical Centre «Gladent»
Россия
Россия
O. Kalashnikova
Medical clinic «MedSwiss»
Россия
Россия
I. Kononov
Department of oral rehabilitation of the Private Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Moscow Witte University
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Nocini PF, D’Agostino A, Chiarini L, Trevisiol L, Procacci P. Simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy and malar implant placement with delayed prosthetic rehabilitation. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1021–4.
2. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are most successful in providing bone support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):49–70.
3. Testori T, Drago L, Wallace S, Capelli M, Galli F. Prevention and management of postoperative infections after sinus elevation surgery: a clinical consensus and recommendations. Int J Dentistry. 2012;2012:365809.
4. Kasabah S, Krug J, Simůnek A, Lecaro MC. Can mucosal perforation of the maxillary sinus be predicted? Acta Med (Hradec Kralove). 2003;46(1):19–23.
5. Danesh-Sani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(7):724–30.
6. Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Hatano N. Use of zygomatic implants for orthopaedic rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxilla. Periodontol. 2008;47:162–71.
7. Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, et al. Cheek implants placed using the zygomatic anatomical approach versus the classical technique: a proposed system for rhinosinusitis diagnosis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:627–42.
8. Davó R, Pons O. 5-year results of four zygomatic implant-supported, immediately-loaded cross-retained prostheses: a prospective case series. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015;8:169–74.
9. Way V.A. Reshetov I.V., Solodkiy V.G., Ilyichev E.A., Kalashnikova O. Yu. The protocol of zygomatic implantation Quad – a protocol for the installation of «quadruple» transosseous implants. Opportunities, prospects. Dentist Minsk 2017. no. 1(24) p. 38–41
10. Alzoubi F, Bedrossian E, Wong A, Farrell D, Park C, Indresano T. Outcome evaluation of fully edentulous patients with an implant-supported fixed profile prosthesis using a graft-free approach. Part 1: clinically related outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:897–903.
11. Candel E, Peñarrocha D, Peñarrocha M. Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with pterygoid implants: a review. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(S1):461–6.
12. Engelhardt S, Papacosta P, Rathe F, Özen J, Jansen JA, Junker R. Annual failure rates and marginal bone-level changes of immediate versus conventional loading of dental implants. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(6):671–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12363
13. Esposito M, Worthington HV. Interventions to replace missing teeth: zygomatic dental implants for rehabilitation of the edentulous upper jaw with severe deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9.
14. Chow J, Hui E, Lee PK, Li W. Cheek implants – immediate occlusal loading protocol: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:804–11.
15. Schiroli G, Angiero F, Silvestrini-Biavati A, Benedicenti S. Placement of zygomatic implants using computer-guided flapless surgery: a proposed clinical protocol. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2979–89.
16. Davo R, Malevez C, Rojas J. Immediate function in atrophic maxilla with zygomatic implants: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97: S44–51.Schiroli G, Angiero F, Silvestrini-Biavati A, Benedicenti S. Zygomatic implant placement with flapless computer-guided surgery: a proposed clinical protocol. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2979–89.
17. Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, Ohrnell LO, et al. Zygoma fixation in the management of advanced atrophy of maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38:70–85.
18. Gladyshev M.V., Gladyshev A.M., Path V.A., SPEED FOR INSTALLATION OF SCULAR IMPLANTATES No. 2020122645/14(038967)
19. Duarte LR, Filho HN, Francischone CE, Peredo LG, Brånemark PI. Establishment of a protocol for complete rehabilitation of an atrophic maxilla using four zygomatic retainers in an immediate loading system – 30-month clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:186–96.
20. Alzoubi F, Bedrossian E, Wong A, Farrell D, Park C, Indresano T. Outcome evaluation of fully edentulous patients with a fixed implant-supported profile prosthesis using a graft-free approach. Part 1: clinically related outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:897–903.
21. Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Lownie JF, Blackbeard GA. Surgical modifications of the Brånemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:232–7.
22. Stella JP, Warner MR. The axillary gap technique to simplify and improve the orientation of zygomatic dental implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:889–93.
23. Tulasne JF. Osteointegrated fixators in the pterygoid region. In: Worthington P, Branemark PI, editors. Advanced osseointegration surgery: applications in the maxillofacial region. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1992. p. 182–8.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, , , , , . International journal of Innovative Medicine. 2022;(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.33667/2782-4101-2022-1-19-23
For citation:
Gladyshev M., Put V., Dolgalev A., Gladysheva A., Kalashnikova O., Kononov I. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANS-ZYGOMATIC AND PTERYGOID IMPLANT SURGERY TECHNIQUE IN THE REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE MAXILLARY ATROPHY. International journal of Innovative Medicine. 2022;(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.33667/2782-4101-2022-1-19-23
Просмотров:
336
Послать статью по эл. почте 